MarketsFinancial TimesMay 19, 2026· 1 min read
Geopolitical Tensions May Ripple Through Global Economic Relations

Chinese President Xi Jinping reportedly expressed concerns to then-President Trump in 2020 that Russian President Putin might regret invading Ukraine, signaling early Chinese apprehension regarding the conflict's implications. The discussion also included a proposal for US, China, and Russia to cooperate against the International Criminal Court.
A previously undisclosed conversation between then-President Xi Jinping and President Donald Trump in 2020 revealed Xi's apprehension regarding Russia's potential invasion of Ukraine. According to reports, Xi suggested to Trump that Russian President Vladimir Putin might 'regret' such a move, indicating an early awareness and potential unease within Beijing about Moscow's geopolitical ambitions. This communication predates the full-scale invasion by over a year, offering a glimpse into internal Chinese calculus at a critical juncture.
The same discussions also touched upon a controversial proposal by Trump for the US and China to cooperate with Russia in opposing the International Criminal Court (ICC). While the specifics of this cooperation remain vague, the mention highlights a potential alignment of interests between the three global powers on matters of international legal jurisdiction, despite broader geopolitical rivalries. The ICC had, at the time, initiated an investigation into alleged war crimes by US service members in Afghanistan, and Russia had withdrawn its signature from the ICC's founding treaty.
From an economic perspective, Xi's caution could be interpreted as a concern for the stability of global trade and supply chains, which a conflict in Eastern Europe would inevitably disrupt. China, a major global exporter and importer, has a vested interest in a predictable international environment. Any significant military action involving a major energy producer like Russia would carry substantial economic consequences, including commodity price volatility and increased geopolitical risk premiums. The suggestion of cooperation on the ICC, while distinct, points to a shared desire among these nations to navigate international legal frameworks on their own terms, potentially influencing future multilateral agreements and investment protections.
Analyst's Take
While this historical anecdote reveals China's early awareness and potential internal debate over Russia's ambitions, its immediate economic impact is low. However, it implicitly reinforces China's long-term strategic hedging: while maintaining a 'no-limits' partnership with Russia, Beijing also calculates the economic costs of global instability, especially regarding trade and commodity flows, foreshadowing its current 'neutral' stance on the Ukraine war. The lack of a decisive Chinese economic pivot post-invasion suggests Beijing prioritizes its strategic partnership with Moscow over short-term economic disruptions from the conflict, a stance the market may be underestimating in terms of future Western sanction responses.