MarketsLiveMint MoneyApr 27, 2026· 1 min read
LIC Child Plans Offer Varied Returns for Education Savings

LIC's Jeevan Lakshya, New Children's Money Back, and Jeevan Tarun child plans provide various structures for long-term education savings, combining insurance with survival and maturity benefits. These products offer differing Internal Rate of Return (IRR) profiles and payout schedules, designed to help parents fund future educational expenses.
Life Insurance Corporation (LIC) of India continues to position its child-centric insurance plans as key instruments for long-term education savings. An analysis of three prominent offerings—Jeevan Lakshya, New Children’s Money Back, and Jeevan Tarun—reveals distinct structures designed to cater to different parental financial planning needs, particularly concerning future educational expenses. These plans typically combine life insurance coverage with a savings component, featuring survival benefits and maturity payouts intended to align with critical educational milestones.
Key differentiators among the plans include their Internal Rate of Return (IRR) profiles, the timing and quantum of survival benefits, and overall maturity values. Jeevan Lakshya, for instance, is often highlighted for its defined benefits and suitability for long-term goal-based savings. The New Children’s Money Back plan, as its name suggests, provides periodic payouts at specific intervals, which can be particularly useful for funding phased educational costs. Jeevan Tarun offers a flexible payout structure during the policy's final years, allowing policyholders to choose how they receive the survival benefits to best match their child's educational requirements around the age of 20-25.
From an economic perspective, these products represent a significant avenue for household savings directed towards human capital development. The guaranteed returns and structured payout options aim to mitigate the financial risks associated with rising education costs and potential income disruptions. While specific IRR figures are not provided without detailed policy parameters, the comparative analysis suggests that investors should evaluate each plan's cash flow characteristics against their projected educational expenses and risk tolerance. Financial advisors recommend a thorough review of these products' terms and conditions, including premium payment frequencies, benefit payout triggers, and the ultimate maturity corpus, to ensure alignment with individual family financial strategies for educational funding.
Analyst's Take
While positioned for education savings, the fixed-income nature and potential guarantee of these plans reflect a broader retail investor preference for capital preservation in a volatile equity market. The sustained demand for such products may signal underlying consumer caution and a search for predictable returns, potentially diverting funds from more growth-oriented investments, thereby impacting broader capital allocation in the long run.