MarketsLiveMint MoneyJul 13, 2026· 1 min read
Individual Investors Lag in Direct Mutual Fund Adoption

Only 30% of individual investors' mutual fund AUM is in direct plans, contrasting with 77.7% for institutional investors. This gap is attributed to individual investors' reliance on professional advice and specific behavioral patterns.
Despite the potential for higher returns through lower expense ratios, individual investors in India continue to show a strong preference for regular mutual fund plans over direct plans. Data indicates that only 30% of individual investors' Assets Under Management (AUM) in mutual funds are allocated to direct plans. This contrasts sharply with institutional investors, where direct plans constitute a significant 77.7% of their mutual fund AUM.
Direct plans allow investors to bypass distributors and their associated commissions, thereby reducing the total expense ratio (TER) of the fund. Over the long term, even marginal differences in TER can translate into substantial disparities in investor wealth accumulation. Regular plans, conversely, include distributor commissions embedded in their expense ratios, which are then passed on to investors.
Economic analysts point to several factors contributing to this disparity among individual investors. A primary reason cited is the perceived need for professional financial advice. Many retail investors, particularly those new to financial markets, rely on distributors for guidance on fund selection, portfolio allocation, and investment strategy. This advisory service, while valuable, comes at the cost of higher expense ratios in regular plans.
Furthermore, investor behavior plays a crucial role. A lack of awareness regarding the cost implications of regular plans versus direct plans, or the perceived complexity of navigating direct investment platforms, may deter some individuals. The established ecosystem of financial advisors and distributors also provides convenience and familiarity, making the 'regular route' the path of least resistance for many.
The persistence of this preference among individual investors suggests a continued market inefficiency where a significant segment of the investing public may not be optimizing their returns due to higher ongoing costs. While regulations aim to increase transparency, the behavioral and advisory aspects remain powerful drivers of investment choices.
Analyst's Take
The sustained preference for regular plans by individual investors, despite demonstrably lower direct plan costs, highlights an enduring information asymmetry and a mispricing of 'convenience' within the retail investment landscape. This behavioral stickiness indicates that any future regulatory pushes for greater transparency or direct plan promotion may face significant inertia, with entrenched distribution networks likely maintaining their market share for longer than expected.